|
PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 1 |
PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 22,529
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 22,529 |
There is not much demand for an OSX version.
Marco Kalter Allround Automations
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16 Germany, Dortmund
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 16 Germany, Dortmund |
Hey Marco,
there absolutely is! Perhaps people do not ask for it, because you can run it in a VM. But wouldn't it speed up the demand for a new release? We have seen the last release in August last year. To be honest, I gave up renewing my annual contract, because I do not see any issue in renewing for a IDE I have to run in a VM.
All my colleges have turned to a Mac in the last couple of months or are planing to. It is the most sex machine in the marked. Makes you much more productive. Just imagen this in addition to the boosting version of PLSQLDEV.
Hope you change your mind Holger
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 530 Portland, OR, USA
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 530 Portland, OR, USA |
Macs have become popular where I work as well and most run PL/SQL Developer through a VM. All of our DBA's use them and developers are starting to convert. Macs have a lot of what I loved with Linux and I considered it. I especially like the terminal programs and how they work with UNIX. I stuck with Windows only because of PL/SQL Developer and running it through VM seemed like, "What's the point of using a Mac then?" There's no way I'm giving up PL/SQL developer.
I don't know how much of a demand there is, but it would be sweet!
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 339
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 339 |
[quote=mike]I especially like the terminal programs and how they work with UNIX.[/quote]
As I don't know Mac, I wonder what way are they better than Putty on Windows.
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 530 Portland, OR, USA
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 530 Portland, OR, USA |
PuTTY is great. It's what I use. I also use MTPuTTY as a wrapper so there are multiple tabs and I can easily switch between multiple UNIX logins. In the past, I've also added an X-server to Windows to be able to run Oracle Reports on UNIX. All of that took time to research and set up. The X-Server took me lots of time to figure out and half a day to install (maybe others are faster than me!). I didn't bother with an X-Server on my new PC since reports are rare and I can do it on Windows.
I haven't used Macs either, so I possibly don't know what I'm talking abut. From what I've seen when I'm at their cubicles though, the terminals for Mac look very polished and have tabs built in. I know that in Linux, the X-Server is built in so X-Windows apps work without needing to add an X-Server. I think (don't know for sure) that Macs have that built in as well.
Anyway, X-Server, tabs, and a polished look. All working without monkeying around. That seems nice to me and that is what I meant when I said that. I also like the virtual desktops that Macs have.
On the other hand, I hear complaints once in a while that the Windows VM crashes and stuff and I'm not totally convinced yet that I should switch.
Last edited by mike; 01/24/14 04:10 PM.
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 339
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 339 |
Thank you for answering. At my current employer, we use Windows clients. I used to boot Linux once in a while to install/patch Oracle, but since someone asked for Xming X Server for Windows once, I have that too. It's easy to install and works well with Putty (when X11 forwarding is enabled). Oracle Reports is on the web nowadays. Well, not for us die hard 6i users.
Last edited by T-Gergely; 01/28/14 09:49 AM.
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 11
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 11 |
Hi Marco
YES, WE NEED A MAC VERSION. PLEASE.
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 40 Spain
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 40 Spain |
------------------------------- Elias F.M.
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 11
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 11 |
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 23
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 23 |
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52 Lenzburg, Switzerland
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 52 Lenzburg, Switzerland |
Our Mac Developers are switching to SQL Developer because PL/SQL Developer doesn't run on the Mac.
Last edited by til; 06/18/20 07:36 AM.
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 7 |
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 11
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 11 |
Hi all, dell just released Toad for oracle for macos, it's beauty at all ! you can try. and persuade your compony buy licence for it.
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20 Utrecht, The Netherlands
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 20 Utrecht, The Netherlands |
+1 for a MacOS version of PL/SQL Developer (please)
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 22,529
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 22,529 |
We're working on a new cross-platform PL/SQL Development tool for MacOS, Linux, and Windows: Plyxon. It is currently in beta.
Marco Kalter Allround Automations
|
|
|
Re: PL/SQL Developer why not support for Mac OS X?
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 7
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 7 |
It looks interesting. Any plans on a jdbc version that doesn't require Instant Client? Oracle hasn't released an instant client for M1+ processors yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|