Print Thread
Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
vllr #36743 12/10/09 05:56 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
V
Member
Offline
Member
V
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Sorry to ask again - but I just checked and figured out that I requested this feature (compare objects in different schema in production environment with what we have in dev/QC) for the first time back in December, 2004. And I believe I was not alone with this request.
Though there was some improvement in this area with latest releases, we can still not do what we need. Is there any REAL problem in fixing it so it takes more than 5 years? Sorry again - but it doesn't look like our requests are counted...

Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
vllr #36763 12/11/09 06:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
V
Member
Offline
Member
V
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Any chance to get any response?

Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
vllr #36767 12/14/09 10:40 AM
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 22,206
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 22,206
We're looking into a solution.


Marco Kalter
Allround Automations
Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
Marco Kalter #36812 12/15/09 07:16 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
V
Member
Offline
Member
V
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Any chance to have an estimate? Wait 5 more years?

Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
vllr #36882 12/28/09 03:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
V
Member
Offline
Member
V
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
Can we expect this issue to be fixed soon?

Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
vllr #36940 01/06/10 05:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
Toronto
D
Member
Offline
Member
D
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6
Toronto
Our organization would also greatly benefit from a solution to this compare object limitation. If it helps at all to raise the urgency of this case - we have an active 100 user support contract.

Would it be possible to get an update with respect to when we might be able to see a fix? ie. Will it make it into an 8.0 patch level?

Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
djkucera #36951 01/07/10 01:25 PM
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 22,206
Member
Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 22,206
We are working on a fix. At the moment you need to have access to the dba views for both the source and target connection.


Marco Kalter
Allround Automations
Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
Marco Kalter #36958 01/07/10 05:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 20
New Jersey, USA
J
Member
OP Offline
Member
J
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 20
New Jersey, USA
Hi Marco,

Thanks for your help on this.

I tried compare from a source account with select_catalog_role to a target account with select_catalog_role so both accounts had access to the dba_views and they owned no objects. The compare window did not display any objects when I selected an object owning schema. The objects for the schema are, however, displayed in the object browser when "all users" or the schema is specified. It looks like the compare is not using the dba views even when "Use DBA view if available" option is checked.

Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
djkucera #36962 01/08/10 04:07 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
V
Member
Offline
Member
V
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 63
[quote=djkucera]Our organization would also greatly benefit from a solution to this compare object limitation. If it helps at all to raise the urgency of this case - we have an active 100 user support contract.

Would it be possible to get an update with respect to when we might be able to see a fix? ie. Will it make it into an 8.0 patch level?
[/quote]
We are even bigger - unlimited user licence. And EVERY user in our organization is dreaming about this option...

Re: Compare objects with only select_catalog_role on target user
vllr #36988 01/12/10 03:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
A
Member
Offline
Member
A
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
I just wanted to check on this, please update.
Thanks

Page 2 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  support 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.4
(Release build 20200307)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.1.33 Page Time: 0.189s Queries: 15 (0.088s) Memory: 2.5605 MB (Peak: 3.0380 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2024-04-29 08:05:35 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS