Recent content by vllr

Version 16.0.7.2172. Looks like BEAUTIFY command is working successfully only for packages. Views beautification is still having exactly the same problem as reported originally - if view is opened, it is beautified but not compiled to DB. If view is not opened - error is reported.

Version 16.0.7.2172. - still the same behavior. Any update?

Hello! Version 16.0.7.2172. This still looks like a problem - any update?

Marco, not sure if I'm doing something wrong or just do not understand something. What does BEAUTIFY Object exactly doing? I was expecting specified object being beautified in DB, but instead this is what is happening for me: 1. If Object is not currently opened in program window - running this...

Guys, is there any way to keep named not null check constraints in original style when DDL is generated? Example: This is original DDL script for table creation: create table TEST_CONS ( col1 VARCHAR2(10) constraint CK_col1_not_null not null, col2 VARCHAR2(10), col3...

Looks like a bug: If "virtual" checkbox is selected for some column, "invisible" column is not clickable. Also, even if column is altered with "alter {table} modify {column} invisible", "invisible" checkbox is not checked in table editor.

From documentation: Always include owner prefix. When enabled, DLL extracted from the database will always include the owner prefix. When disabled, the owner will be omitted if you are connected as the owner: In both cases the owner prefix will be included if you are connected as a different...

Marco, is it possible to return something from external tool/script? We have some internal standards for generation constraints/foreign key names and this is done by special custom plsql package that accepts table name as a parameter and returns names according to this standard. It would be...

Marco, one enhancement request related to Object Types handling in Code assistant. When you create new instance of Object Type like obj := MyType(... code assistant shows default constructor only. It would be very helpful if we have the same functionality for selecting the overridden...

Sorry if this one was already asked/reported - wasn't able to find. Beautifier allows to control comma position for record type creation (before/after record field), but it looks like Object Types are ALWAYS beautified as "comma after" and there is no way to control it. Would be nice to have...

Marco, can I suggest implementing some very simple system for tracking suggested enhancements with voting mechanism on your site? There are definitely things, suggested by others, that I'd like to see. And there are definitely things, that will not probably have any vote from any other person...

I believe this (or very close to this) was requested at least several years ago. The answer was the same - "I have added this to the list of enhancement requests". I wonder - how do you guys priorities requests? And, by the way, how about comparing objects in different schemas? Still doesn't...

But usually when you compare - you can always have settings to ignore case. Why would you compare with case sensitivity on?

Any chance to hear anything new on this problem?

Just curious - why would you care about it???