Recent content by paweld

The testcase from my previous post http://www.allroundautomations.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=3&t=003294 still produces misleading results Regards, paweld

Hello! Thank you all in Allround Automations very much for eliminating errors in compare mechanism mentioned e.g. here . However it wasn't difficult to produce next example where compare function fails. Below three different examples which are identical according to "Compare user objects"...

22.04.2005 FrankMUC wrote "It would be nice to have the possiblity to include the synonyms in comparing user objects of two schemas even though a synonym is not a real object." and Marco Kalter replied "This is on the list of enhancement requests." (see...

Hello Marco! I've thought about the possibility of stating while comparing tables that a column had been deleted. It is rather difficult problem, I suppose. Is it solvable? It may turn out that only in simple cases (as the FIRST_TEST_DROP_COL example). However the script generated by PL/SQL...

Hello! At the very beginning must stress my surprise that the bug which follows haven't been fixed so far. It's above one year when it was reported (see previous report ). :eek: :eek: :eek: Here is support info from my PC: PL/SQL Developer Version 7.0.1.1066 (MBCS) 97.33630 - 20...